Yahoo! News: Iraq
Yahoo! News: Iraq |
- A Florida couple has been charged after being caught getting groceries, washing their car, and walking their dog despite testing positive for the coronavirus
- Here's what we know about Trump suggesting the idea of delaying the November election
- Madeleine McCann: Suspect's lawyer calls police allotment search 'a desperate act'
- Thousands march in Berlin against coronavirus curbs
- Russia is aiming for an approved COVID-19 vaccine in the next fortnight to portray itself as a global science leader, but there are major concerns over a lack of data and testing
- Washington State Trapped Its First 'Murder Hornet'
- Police killings marked with backyard barbecues, secretive rituals, ex-captain alleges
- A 54-year-old New Jersey woman was hospitalized after a violent confrontation in Staples over a face mask
- Conservatives take up death of Black man who supported Trump
- Judge bans Ghislaine Maxwell lawyers from identifying alleged victims for fear they may be harassed and drop out of case
- ‘We don’t need someone distracted with Twitter’: Ilhan Omar fights off tough primary challenge
- Florida, Virginia, and North Carolina declare emergencies as Hurricane Isaias hits the Bahamas and barrels toward the east coast
- Jim Jordan tries and fails to get Fauci to say protesters should be arrested for gathering during pandemic
- Staples customer who told woman to wear mask is thrown to ground, has broken leg
- Case of Islamic State recruit's UK citizenship goes to Supreme Court
- A Black Lives Matter mural is set to be removed in Tulsa after the city received a request for a pro-police painting
- New Disclosures Confirm: Trump Himself Was the Target of Obama Administration’s Russia Probe
- Texas city commissioner killed in gun battle with police
- US election 2020: The war hero who could be Biden's running mate
- A hotel in Australia had to ban a pair of 6-foot emus for overstepping their guest privileges
- James Murdoch Quits News Corp Board Over Editorial Disagreements
- Hurricane Isaias slams Puerto Rico, could hit Florida on weekend
- 14 photos of the low key Hajj: Only 10,000 Muslim pilgrims in face masks made it to Mecca this year.
- Trump can't postpone the election, but officials worry he and the GOP could starve it
- Tenant arrested for allegedly decapitating landlord with a sword over rent dispute
- Biden, Bernie forces clash during convention meeting
- Connie Culp, 1st US partial face transplant recipient, dies
- DC releases police footage from 2018 deaths of 3 Black men
- Hurricane Isaias bringing heavy winds, rain to Bahamas as it takes aim at Florida
- "There's a complete disconnect": Florida's school digital divide
- Democratic congressman calls out maskless GOP colleagues after positive coronavirus test
- 'Alarms are going off' as NJ coronavirus cases rise
- A DHS intelligence report showed the department had collected and analyzed messages between Portland protesters, a new report says
- Crashed plane packed with cocaine was bound for Australia, police say
- Engel subpoenas State Dept. for Biden documents given to Senate Republicans
- Exclusive: CDC projects U.S. coronavirus death toll could top 180,000 by Aug. 22
- Ex-Weinstein Attorney Lisa Bloom Loses Money Grab in Autistic Kid’s Settlement
- Florida couple busted for breaking COVID-19 quarantine insists they were just walking the dog
- India scraps English as mandatory language in primary schools amid nationalist surge
- SpaceX's first crewed mission is headed back to Earth. Here's every step that must go perfectly for 2 NASA astronauts to come home safely.
- Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's death sentence overturned by appeals court
- 'Back To The Future' With Biden’s female VP Pick
Posted: 01 Aug 2020 02:45 AM PDT |
Here's what we know about Trump suggesting the idea of delaying the November election Posted: 31 Jul 2020 06:53 AM PDT |
Madeleine McCann: Suspect's lawyer calls police allotment search 'a desperate act' Posted: 31 Jul 2020 05:49 AM PDT Christian Brückner's lawyer has described the excavation of a Hannover allotment by police as "a pure desperate act" in his first statement on the case. Friedrich Sebastian Fülscher, representing the 43-year-old lead suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, issued the statement in response to the two-day search by Braunschweig police at an allotment plot just outside Hannover earlier this week. Federal officers uncovered a sealed cellar on Wednesday. Locals said Brückner had stayed in the area in 2007, the year in which three-year-old Madeleine went missing from Praia da Luz in Portugal. Brückner is currently serving a sentence for drugs charges, but it was revealed on Friday that his lawyers have put in a new bid for his release, meaning he could walk free on January 7. In a statement on Friday, Mr Fülscher called the search "a pure desperate act of the public prosecutor's office". "Apparently, it's hard for investigators to admit they backed the wrong horse," the lawyer said. "My client is silent on the charges, but that doesn't mean he has anything to hide." Discussing the rape of a 72-year-old American woman for which Brückner was jailed for seven years last year, which he continues to deny, Mr Fülscher said it was "totally unusual" for someone to be a both a paedophile and a gerontophile. |
Thousands march in Berlin against coronavirus curbs Posted: 01 Aug 2020 05:38 AM PDT Thousands marched in Berlin on Saturday to protest against measures imposed in Germany to stem the coronavirus pandemic, saying they violated people's rights and freedoms. The gathering, estimated by police at 17,000, included libertarians, constitutional loyalists and anti-vaccination activists. There was also a small far-right presence with some marchers carrying Germany's black, white and red imperial flag. |
Posted: 31 Jul 2020 09:41 PM PDT |
Washington State Trapped Its First 'Murder Hornet' Posted: 01 Aug 2020 12:24 PM PDT |
Police killings marked with backyard barbecues, secretive rituals, ex-captain alleges Posted: 31 Jul 2020 03:25 PM PDT |
Posted: 01 Aug 2020 09:31 AM PDT |
Conservatives take up death of Black man who supported Trump Posted: 31 Jul 2020 10:23 AM PDT |
Posted: 31 Jul 2020 09:47 AM PDT The judge presiding over the Ghislaine Maxwell case has banned her lawyers from publicly naming abuse victims involved in the lawsuit.US District Judge Alison J Nathan ruled that Ms Maxwell's attorneys cannot reveal the names of the individuals accusing her of sexual crimes in the course of her work for infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. |
‘We don’t need someone distracted with Twitter’: Ilhan Omar fights off tough primary challenge Posted: 01 Aug 2020 04:00 AM PDT |
Posted: 01 Aug 2020 09:48 AM PDT |
Posted: 31 Jul 2020 09:45 AM PDT Dr. Anthony Fauci wants to make it clear he's got nothing to do with the justice system.Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, appeared before Congress on Friday for a hearing on the federal government's coronavirus response. That's where Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), who's been skeptical of restrictions meant to stem the virus' spread, tried to get Fauci to distinguish between protests against racism in the U.S. and bans on businesses reopening amid the pandemic.Because science indicates crowds exacerbate the spread of coronavirus, Jordan asked Fauci on Friday if the government "should limit the protests." "I'm not in a position to determine what the government should do in a forceful way," Fauci responded. So Jordan kept pressing: "The government is stopping people from going to church," claiming that's something "the five liberals" on the Supreme Court had decided. But Fauci continued holding out, saying he does not "judge one crowd versus another crowd" and would not "opine on who should get arrested or not. That's not my position."Jordan then went so far as to claim Fauci had said "protests increase the spread" of coronavirus. "I said crowds, I didn't say specifically, I didn't say protests or anything, " Fauci firmly responded. "You're putting words in my mouth," Fauci continued before saying he had no data showing the nationwide protests had spread the virus. Watch the whole exchange below. > Rep. Jordan: So, you're allowed to protest, millions of people in crowds...but you try to run your business and you get arrested?> > Dr. Fauci: I don't understand what you're asking me, as a public health official, to opine on who should get arrested or not. That's not my position pic.twitter.com/fAZEqbLz5q> > -- CBS News (@CBSNews) July 31, 2020More stories from theweek.com Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez picked the wrong statue to criticize Is Western Europe losing its grip on the coronavirus? Democratic congressman calls out maskless GOP colleagues after positive coronavirus test |
Staples customer who told woman to wear mask is thrown to ground, has broken leg Posted: 01 Aug 2020 06:51 AM PDT |
Case of Islamic State recruit's UK citizenship goes to Supreme Court Posted: 31 Jul 2020 12:45 PM PDT |
Posted: 01 Aug 2020 12:09 PM PDT |
New Disclosures Confirm: Trump Himself Was the Target of Obama Administration’s Russia Probe Posted: 01 Aug 2020 03:30 AM PDT Long-sought documents finally pried from U.S. intelligence agencies prove that the Obama administration used the occasion of providing a standard intelligence briefing for major-party candidates as an opportunity to investigate Donald Trump on suspicion of being a Russian asset.I say investigate Donald Trump advisedly.As I contended in Ball of Collusion, my book on the Trump-Russia investigation, the target of the probe spearheaded by the FBI -- but greenlighted by the Obama White House, and abetted by the Justice Department and U.S. intelligence agencies -- was Donald Trump. Not the Trump campaign, not the Trump administration. Those were of interest only insofar as they were vehicles for Trump himself. The campaign, which the Bureau and its apologists risibly claim was the focus of the investigation, would have been of no interest to them were it not for Trump.Or do you suppose they moved heaven and earth, surreptitiously plotted in the Oval Office, wrote CYA memos to cover their tracks, and laboriously sculpted FBI reports because they were hoping to nail . . . George Papadopoulos?My book was published a year ago. It covered what was then known about the Obama-administration operation. In collusion with the Clinton campaign, and with the complicity of national-security officials who transitioned into the Trump administration, the Obama White House deployed the FBI to undermine the new president, dually using official investigative tactics (e.g. FISA surveillance, confidential informants, covert interrogations) and lawless classified leaks -- the latter publicized by dependable journalists who were (and remain) politically invested in unseating Trump.Now the paper trail is finally catching up with what some of us analysts long ago surmised based on the limited information previously available.You don't like Donald Trump? Fine. The investigation here was indeed about Donald Trump. But the scandal is about how abusive officials can exploit their awesome powers against any political opponent. And the people who authorized this political spying will be right back in business if, come November, Obama's vice-president is elected president -- notwithstanding that he's yet to be asked serious questions about it.How to Conceal a Politicized Investigation It seems mind-boggling that, for so long, the FBI and Justice Department were able to keep a lid on the documents now being released. President Trump could have directed their disclosure at any time over the last four years. But when you think about it, concealing the paper trail was the easy part. The real challenge was: How to continue the probe even after Trump had taken office and was, at least nominally, in a position to shut it down?The Obama officials, including holdovers who transitioned into the Trump administration, pulled that off by intimidation: not-so-subtle suggestions that they could disclose damaging allegations at any time (e.g., the notorious "pee tape"), and that White House efforts to inquire into the scope of the investigation would be portrayed as criminal obstruction.Prior to the 2016 election, the FBI intentionally concealed the existence of the Trump-Russia probe from the congressional "Gang of Eight" (the bipartisan leadership of both houses and their intelligence committees). Senior Republicans were thus kept in the dark regarding purported suspicions that the Republican presidential campaign was a Russian front, unable to pose tough questions about the probe's gossamer predication.Crucially, the Trump-Russia fabulists managed to sideline two Trump loyalists who would have been positioned to thwart the effort: national-security adviser Michael Flynn and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. That left in place Obama holdovers and Trump-appointed placeholders. They were indifferent to Trump himself and cowed by the prospect of being framed as complicit in a Trump–Russia conspiracy, or a cover-up.The paper record is profoundly embarrassing, so it is only natural that the FBI and Justice Department resisted its disclosure. But documents about the investigation were demanded by congressional investigators starting years ago -- particularly by the investigation led in the House by then–Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes (R., Calif.).Congress's investigation was stonewalled. The more revelation we get, the more obvious it is that there was no bona fide national-security rationale for concealment. Documents were withheld to hide official and unofficial executive activity that was abusive, embarrassing, and, at least in some instances, illegal (e.g., tampering with a document that was critical to the FBI's presentation of "facts" to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court).Democrats wanted this information suppressed all along. So of course, once Democrats took control of the House in 2019, there was no possibility of pressing the question of why the Justice Department and FBI failed to comply with House information demands back in 2017–18, when Republicans led the relevant committees.One wonders, though, why the GOP-controlled Senate had so little interest in finding out why this paper trail stayed hidden despite repeated inquiries. Ditto the House Republican leadership in the first two years of Trump's term. It is hard to draw any conclusion other than that the GOP establishment bought the "Russian interference in our democracy" hysteria.Moscow always meddles in U.S. elections. The 2016 interference was par for the course and, as always, utterly ineffective. This time, though, Democrats were perceived as the victims, rather than the beneficiaries. For once, they and their media megaphone demanded that the political class treat Russia as a serious threat. On cue, Washington Republicans genuflected, lest they be portrayed as covering up for Trump, or as soft on Putin. Meanwhile Democrats, the party of appeasement (very much including appeasement of Moscow through the Obama years), were transmogrified into Russia hawks. And Russia hawks they'll remain . . . right up until the moment Joe Biden takes the oath of office.Exploiting Politics to Surveil the Opposition Among the most significant of the newly declassified documents is a memorandum written by FBI agent Joe Pientka III, the case agent on Trump-Russia. It was Pientka who, at the FBI's New York City headquarters on August 17, 2016, purported to brief Trump and two top campaign surrogates -- the aforementioned General Flynn and then–New Jersey governor Chris Christie, who was slated to run the transition if Trump won.In reality, Pientka and the FBI regarded the occasion not as a briefing for the Republican presidential nominee but as an opportunity to interact with Donald Trump for investigative purposes. Clearly, the Bureau did that because Trump was the main subject of the investigation. The hope was that he'd blurt things out that would help the FBI prove he was an agent of Russia.The Obama administration and the FBI knew that it was they who were meddling in a presidential campaign -- using executive intelligence powers to monitor the president's political opposition. This, they also knew, would rightly be regarded as a scandalous abuse of power if it ever became public. There was no rational or good-faith evidentiary basis to believe that Trump was in a criminal conspiracy with the Kremlin or that he'd had any role in Russian intelligence's suspected hacking of Democratic Party email accounts.You didn't have to believe Trump was a savory man to know that. His top advisers were Flynn, a decorated combat veteran; Christie, a former U.S. attorney who vigorously investigated national-security cases; Rudy Giuliani, a legendary former U.S. attorney and New York City mayor who'd rallied the country against anti-American terrorism; and Jeff Sessions, a longtime U.S. senator with a strong national-defense track record. To believe Trump was unfit for the presidency on temperamental or policy grounds was a perfectly reasonable position for Obama officials to take -- though an irrelevant one, since it's up to the voters to decide who is suitable. But to claim to suspect that Trump was in a cyberespionage conspiracy with the Kremlin was inane . . . except as a subterfuge to conduct political spying, which Obama officials well knew was an abuse of power.So they concealed it. They structured the investigation on the fiction that there was a principled distinction between Trump himself and the Trump campaign. In truth, the animating assumption of the probe was that Trump himself was acting on Russia's behalf, either willfully or under the duress of blackmail. By purporting to focus on the campaign, investigators had the fig leaf of deniability they needed to monitor the candidate.Just two weeks before Pientka's August 17 "briefing" of Trump, the FBI formally opened "Crossfire Hurricane," the codename for the Trump-Russia investigation. The Bureau also opened four Trump-Russia subfiles, related to Trump campaign officials Paul Manafort, Carter Page, George Papadopoulos and Flynn.There was no case file called "Donald Trump" because Trump was "Crossfire Hurricane." The theory of Crossfire Hurricane was that Russia had blackmail information on Trump, which it could use to extort Trump into doing Putin's bidding if Trump were elected. It was further alleged that Russia had been cultivating Trump for years and was helping Trump's election bid in exchange for future considerations. Investigators surmised that Trump had recruited Paul Manafort (who had connections to Russian oligarchs and pro-Russia Ukrainian oligarchs) as his campaign manager, enabling Manafort to use such emissaries as Page to carry out furtive communications between Trump and the Kremlin. If elected, the theory went, Trump would steer American policy in Russia's favor, just as the Bureau speculated that Trump was already corruptly steering the Republican party into a more pro-Moscow posture.Get Them Talking Besides obtaining FISA surveillance warrants against Page, the Bureau's favored tactic -- a common one in criminal investigations -- was to create or exploit situations in which the suspects would be at ease. Either the settings would not seem investigative or, in Trump's case, repeated assurances were provided that he was not under investigation. With no notice that the FBI was trying to catch them and even prompt them into making incriminating statements, Trump and his campaign advisers would be invited to talk about Russia. Agents parsed their statements and scrutinized their demeanor, searching for any indication of pro-Russia sentiment or uneasiness about the topic -- anything that could be portrayed as incriminating. If the Bureau's contacts with Trump officials were not covertly recorded (as they were, for example, when informants interacted with Papadopoulos), agents would generate written reports about them, the kind of reports the FBI routinely writes when building a criminal case.This is exactly what Pientka did in connection with the August 17 "briefing," under the supervision of Kevin Clinesmith, the rabidly anti-Trump FBI lawyer later found by the Justice Department's inspector general to have tampered with a key email, and Peter Strzok, the rabidly anti-Trump counterintelligence agent who was later fired.Pientka's significantly redacted seven-page memo is worth reading. The point of it is not the national-security information provided to the candidate; that is just context for the Bureau's documenting of statements made by Trump in response. For example, when the topic is differences in methodology between Russian and Chinese espionage, Pientka carefully notes that Trump asked, "Joe, are the Russians bad? Because they have more numbers [of FBI cases] are they worse than the Chinese?" After all, maybe we'll find out he was reporting back to the Kremlin. When the topic turned to signals intelligence, Pientka notes that Trump interjected, "Yes I understand it's a dark time. Nothing is safe on computers anymore," and elaborated that his then-ten-year-old son had broken the code for access to a computer -- you know, just the kind of badinage you'd expect from a co-conspirator in a Russian hacking scheme.Pientka then recounts that when other intelligence-agency briefers took over to continue the briefing on other topics, Pientka did not leave; he stayed in the room "actively listen[ing] for topics or questions regarding the Russian Federation." Here, in a classified report they figure no one will ever see, there is no pretense: FBI agents are monitoring Trump. Pientka notes that when one briefer said the U.S. was the world's leader in counterterrorism, Trump interjected, "Russia too?" And when the discussion turned to cheating by Russia and China on the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, "Trump asked, 'Who's worse?'" When the briefer replied, "They are both bad, but Russia is worse," Pientka took pains to relate, "Trump and Christie turned toward each other and Christie commented, 'Im shocked'" [sic].You're thinking, "So what?" Yeah, well, that's the point. They had nothing, but the agents were exploiting the U.S. political process to try to turn nothing into a federal case. And would any public official voluntarily attend a security briefing, ostensibly meant to help him perform his public-safety mission, if he thought the FBI might be spying on him and writing reports with an eye toward portraying him as a hostile power's mole?Just as we've seen in the Flynn investigation, Pientka's official FBI report is marked in bold capital letters: "DRAFT DOCUMENT/DELIBERATIVE MATERIAL." Why deliberate over a draft when the purpose is to document a suspect's statements? After all, he said whatever he said; there shouldn't be a need to edit it. Drafts and deliberations are necessary only if a report is being massaged to fit the perceived needs of the investigation. Observe that, although the briefing was August 17, the memo is dated August 30. Nearly two weeks later, and it's still in the form of a deliberative draft, meaning they're not done yet.This is not materially different from the Obama administration's plan on January 6, 2017. That is when the FBI's then-director, James Comey, "briefed" Trump in New York City. This briefing came just a day after Comey met with his Obama-administration superiors -- the president, Vice President Biden, national-security adviser Susan Rice, and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. They discussed withholding information about the Russia investigation from President-elect Trump and his incoming team.Consistent with this White House strategy session, Comey did not actually brief Trump about the Russia investigation; he buzzed Trump with an allegation that the Putin regime might be in possession of blackmail material -- the pee tape -- that it could hold over Trump's head in order to get him to do the Kremlin's bidding.The point was not to give information. It was to get information: to provoke Trump into making incriminating or false statements, or statements evincing consciousness of guilt. Outside Trump Tower was an FBI car equipped with a laptop so Comey could immediately write an investigative report. The director and his team treated this as an investigative event, not a briefing. Comey memorialized Trump's statements, as well as his physical and emotional reaction to the suggestion that Moscow might have video of the soon-to-be president cavorting with prostitutes. If a case had ever been made on Trump, Comey could then have been a witness, with his investigative report available to refresh his recollection about Trump's comments and comportment.That is one of the main reasons such reports are done.The FBI did the same thing with Flynn: a sandbag interview, against Justice Department and White House protocols, conducted after extensive planning about how to put him at ease, how to make sure he doesn't think he's a suspect, how to refrain from advising him of his rights. Then, knock him back on his heels by portraying a legitimate conversation between the incoming national-security adviser and the Russian ambassador as if it were nefarious. Don't play him the recording or show him the transcript; just grill him and hope he says something incriminating or redolent of guilty knowledge. And then, instead of following the FBI rules for promptly completing interview reports, generate another "deliberative draft" that can be kneaded for a few weeks . . . with the help of a former prosecutor (Lisa Page) who serves as counsel to the second-highest-ranking FBI official (then–deputy director Andrew McCabe).There is still plenty of paper trail to uncover. I haven't even referred here to the Steele dossier, which investigators knew was bogus but relied on to seek -- and obtain -- court-authorized eavesdropping. I haven't mentioned the unmasking of Trump officials indirectly targeted in foreign-intelligence collection. We haven't considered the collaboration of American and foreign intelligence agencies in the scrutiny of Trump, or the collaboration of Obama officials and congressional Democrats, as well as the media, to promote the narrative that Trump was a Russian operative. There is much still to learn and to weigh.But this much we know: In the stretch run of the 2016 campaign, President Obama authorized his administration's investigative agencies to monitor his party's opponent in the presidential election, on the pretext that Donald Trump was a clandestine agent of Russia. Realizing this was a gravely serious allegation for which there was laughably insufficient predication, administration officials kept Trump's name off the investigative files. That way, they could deny that they were doing what they did. Then they did it . . . and denied it. |
Texas city commissioner killed in gun battle with police Posted: 01 Aug 2020 11:40 AM PDT |
US election 2020: The war hero who could be Biden's running mate Posted: 31 Jul 2020 05:47 PM PDT |
A hotel in Australia had to ban a pair of 6-foot emus for overstepping their guest privileges Posted: 31 Jul 2020 10:35 AM PDT |
James Murdoch Quits News Corp Board Over Editorial Disagreements Posted: 31 Jul 2020 02:31 PM PDT James Murdoch has resigned from the board of his family's news behemoth, News Corp, due to disagreements over editorial content published by the company's notoriously right-wing outlets, The Daily Beast has confirmed."Mr. Murdoch informed the Company that his resignation was due to disagreements over certain editorial content published by the Company's news outlets and certain other strategic decisions," a company statement said. He was immediately scrubbed from the company's online list of board directors.The move comes a little over six months after Rupert Murdoch's eldest son issued a stunning rebuke of his family's media empire and its promotion of climate-change skeptics during Australia's bushfire crisis.James Murdoch Slams Fox News and News Corp Over Climate-Change Denial"Kathryn and James' views on climate are well established and their frustration with some of the News Corp and Fox coverage of the topic is also well known," a spokesperson for the couple exclusively told The Daily Beast at the time as wildfires raged in Australia."They are particularly disappointed with the ongoing denial among the news outlets in Australia given obvious evidence to the contrary."In contrast, James' brother Lachlan, News Corp's co-chairman, personally okayed Tucker Carlson's recent non-apology for racist rants penned by his top writer.In a brief resignation letter dated July 31 and addressed to the board of directors, James wrote, "I hereby tender my resignation as a member of the Board of Directors of News Corporation (the "Company"), effective as of the date hereof. My resignation is due to disagreements over certain editorial content published by the Company's news outlets and certain other strategic decisions."The board of directors will be reduced to 10 members as a result, headed by Murdoch's father, Rupert, and Lachlan.Rupert and Lachlan offered a brief statement in response to James' decision: "We're grateful to James for his many years of service to the company. We wish him the very best in his future endeavors."James, 47, often considered the rebel in the infamous Australian media family, had made several less-than-subtle moves away from News Corp's brand of inflammatory and populist journalism in recent months. Last year, the Financial Times reported that he was planning to invest $1 billion in a portfolio of media companies that could include a liberal-leaning news outlet. In March, he reportedly made a large investment in start-ups aimed at tackling fake news. His private investment company, Lupa Systems, partnered with startup incubator Betaworks to fund efforts to fight disinformation and create a "more sustainable news ecosystem," a report said.People who know James were not surprised by Friday's development, which seemed inevitable after he was relieved of his executive responsibilities as CEO of Twenty-First Century Fox—which largely involved the entertainment assets that were sold to the Walt Disney Co. but not the right-leaning, Trump-friendly cash cow Fox News—and began carving out an independent identity from his older brother, Lachlan, and the Murdoch empire.He was increasingly alienated from the Trump administration and the role of Fox News and the New York Post in propping it up. In August 2017, for instance, as Rupert was negotiating the Disney deal and anti-Semitic incidents were on the rise in the United States, James pledged a $1 million donation to the Anti-Defamation League.However, climate change skepticism run in News Corp's right-leaning Australian newspapers and on Fox News in the U.S. brought the long-simmering family rift over climate change to the fore in January with James and wife Kathryn's blistering statement to The Daily Beast."They are pissing inside the tent and that's unusual. It's evidence of how high tensions are within the family over climate change," one News Corp executive told The Daily Beast at the time.James and his activist wife have long been passionate about the environment and climate change. They've donated to U.S. organizations targeting electoral interference, climate change, anti-Semitism, and bipartisan unity, as well as the presidential campaigns of Pete Buttigieg and Joe Biden.Read more at The Daily Beast.Get our top stories in your inbox every day. Sign up now!Daily Beast Membership: Beast Inside goes deeper on the stories that matter to you. Learn more. |
Hurricane Isaias slams Puerto Rico, could hit Florida on weekend Posted: 30 Jul 2020 09:22 PM PDT |
14 photos of the low key Hajj: Only 10,000 Muslim pilgrims in face masks made it to Mecca this year. Posted: 01 Aug 2020 01:59 AM PDT |
Trump can't postpone the election, but officials worry he and the GOP could starve it Posted: 31 Jul 2020 08:07 AM PDT |
Tenant arrested for allegedly decapitating landlord with a sword over rent dispute Posted: 01 Aug 2020 08:31 AM PDT |
Biden, Bernie forces clash during convention meeting Posted: 30 Jul 2020 07:09 PM PDT |
Connie Culp, 1st US partial face transplant recipient, dies Posted: 01 Aug 2020 12:30 PM PDT |
DC releases police footage from 2018 deaths of 3 Black men Posted: 31 Jul 2020 02:33 PM PDT Under pressure from the D.C. Council, Washington's Metropolitan Police Department on Friday released long-sought body camera and security footage from the 2018 deaths of three young Black men in 2018. The release was compelled by an emergency police reform bill that Mayor Muriel Bowser criticized as rushed. "The council has determined that this is the statute, that's the law of the land and we're going to abide by it," said MPD Chief Peter Newsham. |
Hurricane Isaias bringing heavy winds, rain to Bahamas as it takes aim at Florida Posted: 31 Jul 2020 10:06 AM PDT |
"There's a complete disconnect": Florida's school digital divide Posted: 31 Jul 2020 12:30 PM PDT |
Democratic congressman calls out maskless GOP colleagues after positive coronavirus test Posted: 01 Aug 2020 10:44 AM PDT Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) on Saturday announced he is the latest member of Congress to test positive for COVID-19. The 72-year-old congressman, who said he currently has no symptoms and feels fine, had been isolating after coming into contact with Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), who tested positive for the coronavirus earlier this week.Grijalva did not call Gohmert out by name, but said that this week has revealed the consequences of the actions of Republican lawmakers who have gone to work at the Capitol without wearing a mask and taking the virus seriously, something which Gohmert has been accused of throughout the pandemic.> Grijalva added: "Numerous Republican members routinely strut around the Capitol without a mask to selfishly make a political statement at the expense of their colleagues, staff, and their families." pic.twitter.com/BJM72gRYbj> > — Manu Raju (@mkraju) August 1, 2020Three lawmakers, including Grijalva, were self-isolating after exposure to Gohmert. One of the others, Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas) has since tested negative for the virus.More stories from theweek.com Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez picked the wrong statue to criticize Is Western Europe losing its grip on the coronavirus? New Lincoln Project video imagines what it's like to wake up from a coma in 2020 |
'Alarms are going off' as NJ coronavirus cases rise Posted: 31 Jul 2020 01:37 PM PDT |
Posted: 31 Jul 2020 06:47 PM PDT |
Crashed plane packed with cocaine was bound for Australia, police say Posted: 01 Aug 2020 09:02 AM PDT |
Engel subpoenas State Dept. for Biden documents given to Senate Republicans Posted: 31 Jul 2020 08:22 AM PDT |
Exclusive: CDC projects U.S. coronavirus death toll could top 180,000 by Aug. 22 Posted: 31 Jul 2020 10:05 AM PDT |
Ex-Weinstein Attorney Lisa Bloom Loses Money Grab in Autistic Kid’s Settlement Posted: 31 Jul 2020 01:45 PM PDT A federal magistrate on Friday denied attorneys' fees to camera-ready victims' rights lawyer Lisa Bloom, who had tried to block a multimillion-dollar settlement for a sexually abused autistic teenager who was briefly Bloom's client.San Francisco-based U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler instead invalidated Bloom's lien on the settlement from the West Contra Costa Unified School District and awarded $2,250,000—a figure which includes costs and attorneys' fees—to "Brennon B.," a severely disabled student who was repeatedly sexually assaulted on school property by fellow special needs students and a staff member."In light of the benefits that the plaintiff has received in the litigation…the court finds that the settlement is reasonable and that the attorney's fees are reasonable and appropriate," Beeler ruled, while denying Bloom's request to maintain her lien on just the attorneys' fees.Former Harvey Weinstein Attorney Lisa Bloom, Angling for a Hefty Payday, Now Faces Fraud AllegationsBrennon B.'s longtime attorney, Micha Star Liberty, who had a joint venture agreement with Bloom to assist with the case for seven months until Bloom abruptly withdrew in late March 2020, had alleged in court filings that The Bloom Firm had violated terms of the agreement and forged documents and signatures in an unjustified money grab."My client and I are pleased with the court's ruling," Liberty told The Daily Beast, referring to Brennon B. and his mother and legal guardian, Bellinda B. "Lisa Bloom has shown once again that all she cares about is money, and will do anything to get it, including calling the mother of her own former client, a special needs sexual assault victim, a liar in a publicly filed document. Through her disparaging words and her attempt to profit by fraud, her lack of moral compass has yet again been revealed to the world through her own unethical actions." The Bloom Firm, in a statement that said it was "pleased that Brennon B. will receive his portion of the settlement and the justice he deserves," fired back: "This is and has always been an attorney's fees dispute between The Bloom Firm and Liberty Law, that should never have included the clients... Ms. Liberty has gone to great lengths to avoid paying money she is contractually obligated to pay, even using her own clients as pawns, despite knowing that The Bloom Firm's lien could not and would not affect the client's portion. Ms. Liberty also appears intent on using the media to defame and ridicule Ms. Bloom. The Bloom Firm will not stoop to Ms. Liberty's level and has no further comment on her or this matter."Friday's ruling—which is expected to cause the settlement payment to be disbursed by next week—is likely a bad omen for Bloom's attempt to collect a hefty slice of a second multimillion-dollar settlement, also won by Liberty.In that case, "I.V.," a 7-year-old autistic girl, sued the Vacaville Unified School District after her physical and emotional abuse by a school bus driver was caught on video and received intense media coverage.Bloom, whose feminist reputation suffered a massive blow with revelations that she had been secretly helping convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein trash his accusers, has until midnight Friday to file a motion to Sacramento-based U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller.Read more at The Daily Beast.Get our top stories in your inbox every day. Sign up now!Daily Beast Membership: Beast Inside goes deeper on the stories that matter to you. Learn more. |
Florida couple busted for breaking COVID-19 quarantine insists they were just walking the dog Posted: 31 Jul 2020 09:40 PM PDT |
India scraps English as mandatory language in primary schools amid nationalist surge Posted: 31 Jul 2020 07:00 AM PDT India will scrap the mandatory use of English in its primary schools, with subjects instead taught in Hindi or regional languages like Punjabi, for the first time since its independence in 1947. The controversial move is part of the New Education Policy (NEP) 2020, the largest educational shake-up in India in 34 years, which was spearheaded by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) Hindu-nationalist youth wing, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). As part of the reforms, school syllabuses will focus on "ancient Indian knowledge". Abolishing compulsory English is seen as a way to promote a united Indian identity from an early age. For much of the BJP's support base, English is associated with colonial times and the old corrupt ruling Indian elite which followed afterwards and its abolishment as a mandatory language fits Mr. Modi's wider policy of driving Indian nationalism. While only 0.02 percent of India's 1.38 billion citizens speak English as a mother tongue, it was seen as the vital bridge in a diverse country where 19,500 different languages and dialects are spoken. Parents took to social media to express their anger at the decision, saying it would reduce their children's future employment prospects, with fluent English considered essential for highly-coveted and well-paid jobs overseas. "Why would any progressive country want to eliminate [the] English language from primary school? India enjoys a global advantage for we have the highest English speaking workforce, we are heading towards disaster," wrote one user on Twitter. |
Posted: 31 Jul 2020 10:55 AM PDT |
Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's death sentence overturned by appeals court Posted: 31 Jul 2020 12:29 PM PDT A federal appeals court on Friday overturned Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's death sentence for helping carry out the 2013 attack, which killed three people and wounded more than 260 others. Tsarnaev and his older brother set off a pair of homemade pressure-cooker bombs near the finish line of the world-renowned race, tearing through the packed crowd and causing many people to lose legs. A three-judge panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld much of Tsarnaev's conviction but ordered a new trial over what sentence Tsarnaev should receive for the death penalty-eligible crimes he was convicted of. |
'Back To The Future' With Biden’s female VP Pick Posted: 01 Aug 2020 02:00 AM PDT |
You are subscribed to email updates from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |